Opened 10 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#2 closed (wontfix)

investigate VLAN connectivity to CMU

Reported by: hdempsey@bbn.com Owned by: hdempsey@bbn.com
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: CMULAB Version: SPIRAL1
Keywords: CMU, VLAN, I2 Cc: afalk@bbn.com, pgunn@cs.cmu.edu
Dependencies:

Description

Look into how best to establish VLAN connectivity from CMU Lab (128.2.222.223) to Internet2. Their provider is PSC at 3ROX. There is an existing 1Gbps Internet access circuit with fairly low utilization. Perhaps it would support multiple VLANs. Dave Andersen, CMU Lab PI, has been in touch with Wendy Huntoon on this topic some time ago.

Change History (11)

comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

Status: newassigned

comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

Component: GPOCMULAB

comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

Cc: pgunn@cs.cum.edu added
Owner: changed from hdempsey@bbn.com to map@geni.net
Status: assignednew

CMU is currently using GRE tunnels to connect to ProtoGENI in Utah (see ticket #3, and CMU docs referenced from web pages). This ticket anticipates that CMU will use a combination of tunneling solutions such as what's described in ticket #3 and "regular" ethernet VLANS (for any resources that could potentially be reached with a layer 2 VLAN, such as the on-campus testbed resources. The ProtoGENI nodes going into the I2 backbone are examples of a resource that might be useful for the ethernet VLAN connection. Now that we have updated plans for VLANs with I2 as part of ProtoGENI/SPP installation plan, we should update CMU connectivity plans and document on wiki.

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

Cc: pgunn@cs.cmu.edu added; pgunn@cs.cum.edu removed

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by pgunn@cs.cmu.edu

Aaron, I'm starting to go over all the tickets again to update them - is there more information on actual proper I2 connectivity? What is the status of this ticket? Some of the later tickets depend on this - is the plan still to do I2 or is GRE/VPN tunneling solution sufficient?

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by Aaron Falk

Pat-

This is on Mike's & Heidi's to-do list, although not at the top. Yes, we do want native I2 connectivity, if practical, as it will allow CMU resources unaffected by tunneling artifacts to be included in GENI slices. I'll leave to Heidi or Mike to comment on any updates to the status. If you have some cycles to dig into this, it might move faster and we are happy to help.

--aaron

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by Aaron Falk

Owner: changed from map@geni.net to hdempsey@bbn.com

Closing the Spiral 1 milestone MilestoneDate(CMU Lab: Get CMU ProtoGENI node on I2 VLAN)? as incomplete but keeping the ticket open. This ticket will continue to be on the GPO's to do list.

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by nidhi.tare@gmail.com

Thanks for submitting the demo request. We are in the process of making arrangements for your demo. We will get back to you soon for a status update.

Thanks, GPO

comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by nidhi.tare@gmail.com

Thanks for submitting the demo request. We are in the process of making arrangements for your demo. We will get back to you soon for a status update.

Thanks, GPO

comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

All I2 access is now ia tunnels or ION. No more need for this ticket.

comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by hdempsey@bbn.com

Resolution: wontfix
Status: newclosed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.