Custom Query (98 matches)

In testing IG-MON-3 step 5, i found that the manifest cached for each ProtoGENI experiment reports dataplane IP addresses and MAC addresses (or at least it should do so fully once [instaticket:26] has been resolved). However, the only way i was easily able to find control IPs assigned to VMs was the interfaces table:

mysql> select * from interfaces where IP="172.17.3.1";
+---------+------+------+--------------+------------+-----------+-------------+----------------+-------+------+---------------+--------+--------+----------+------+-------+--------------------------------------+---------+
| node_id | card | port | mac          | IP         | IPaliases | mask        | interface_type | iface | role | current_speed | duplex | rtabid | vnode_id | whol | trunk | uuid                                 | logical |
+---------+------+------+--------------+------------+-----------+-------------+----------------+-------+------+---------------+--------+--------+----------+------+-------+--------------------------------------+---------+
| pcvm3-1 |    0 |    1 | 000000000000 | 172.17.3.1 | NULL      | 255.240.0.0 | generic        | eth0  | ctrl | 0             | full   |      0 | NULL     |    0 |     0 | e5b9ad51-a379-11e1-af1c-00009b6224df |       1 | 
+---------+------+------+--------------+------------+-----------+-------------+----------------+-------+------+---------------+--------+--------+----------+------+-------+--------------------------------------+---------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

This table appears to contain IPs only for running experiments, and does not appear to contain real MAC addresses.

1. How can i find what control IPs were assigned to what VMs belonging to now-terminated experiments?
2. How can i find out MAC address assignments for these VMs?

This ticket is being written to capture the findings for the planned IG-EXP-3 InstaGENI Single Site 100 VM Test. All issues captured are known and require no action at this time.

These are the 100 VM scenarios planned for testing:

Scenario 1: 1 Slice with 100 VMs Scenario 2: 2 Slices with 50 VMs each Scenario 3: 4 Slices with 25 VMS each Scenario 4: 50 Slices with 2 VMs each Scenario 5: 100 Slices with 1 VM each Scenario 6: 10 slices with 10 VM each (note 1)

(note 1) This scenario was not in the original test plan, but it is being added based on input from Leigh Stroller.

=> Scenario 1: 1 Slice with 100 VMs in a grid topology

Results: FAILED due to:

 100 nodes of type pcvm requested, but only 50 available nodes of type pcvm found

=> Scenario 2: 2 Slices with 50 VMs each, each sliver uses grid topology

Results: FAILED

Two test runs were completed. 1st try:

• Created first 50 node experiment, no error reported.
• Sliver status reported "resource is busy; try again later" for about 5 minutes,
• then sliverstatus reported error:

    Failed to get SliverStatus on 2exp-50vm at AM https://boss.utah.geniracks.net/protogeni/xmlrpc/am/2.0: 
<Fault -32600: 'Internal Error executing SliverStatus'>

Results 2nd test run:

1. Creatsliver first 50 node sliver which completes without error
2. Sliver status is busy approximately 5 minutes reporting "resource is busy; try again later"
3. Slivestatus eventually fails with "<Fault -32400: 'XMLRPC Server Error'>"

Additional tests results will also be captured as completed.

Background: Listresources showed large number of pcvm slot counts available before the test:

• pc5 had 97 slots
• pc3 had 100 slots

Test sequence:

1. Created 1 sliver named 25vmslice1 with 25 VMs without problems, with the following allocation: 10 VM on pc5, 10 VM on pc3 and 5 VMs on pc4.

2. Created a second sliver named 25vmslice2 with 25 VMs which caused the following error:

Result Summary: Slice urn:publicid:IDN+pgeni.gpolab.bbn.com+slice+25vmslice2 expires on 2012-05-26 14:05:32 UTC
Asked https://boss.utah.geniracks.net/protogeni/xmlrpc/am/2.0 to reserve resources. No manifest Rspec returned. *** ERROR: mapper: Reached run limit. Giving up.
seed = 1338050345
Physical Graph: 6
Calculating shortest paths on switch fabric.
Virtual Graph: 25
Generating physical equivalence classes:6
Type precheck:
Type precheck passed.
Node mapping precheck:
Node mapping precheck succeeded
Policy precheck:
Policy precheck succeeded
Annealing.
Doing melting run
Reverting: forced
Reverting to best solution
Done
   BEST SCORE:  18.71 in 49000 iters and 0.307011 seconds
With 1 violations
Iters to find best score:  48288
Violations: 1
  unassigned:  0
  pnode_load:  0
  no_connect:  0
  link_users:  0
  bandwidth:   1
  desires:     0
  vclass:      0
  delay:       0
  trivial mix: 0
  subnodes:    0
  max_types:   0
  endpoints:   0
Nodes:
VM pc5
VM-0 pc5
VM-1 pc1
VM-10 pc5
VM-11 pc2
VM-12 pc1
VM-13 pc2
VM-14 pc3
VM-15 pc3
VM-16 pc3
VM-19 pc2
VM-2 pc1
VM-20 pc5
VM-21 pc5
VM-22 pc1
VM-23 pc2
VM-24 pc3
VM-26 pc3
VM-27 pc3
VM-3 pc2
VM-4 pc5
VM-5 pc3
VM-6 pc3
VM-7 pc3
VM-9 pc5
End Nodes
Edges:
linksimple/lan0/VM:0,VM-0:0 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan1/VM-0:1,VM-1:0 intraswitch link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null)) link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan2/VM-1:1,VM-2:0 trivial pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan24/VM-9:0,VM-20:0 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan25/VM:1,VM-9:1 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan26/VM-9:2,VM-10:0 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan27/VM-10:1,VM-11:0 intraswitch link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null)) link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan28/VM-11:1,VM-12:0 intraswitch link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null)) link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan29/VM-12:1,VM-13:0 intraswitch link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null)) link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan3/VM-2:1,VM-3:0 intraswitch link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null)) link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan30/VM-13:1,VM-14:0 intraswitch link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null)) link-pc3:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc3/eth2,(null))
linksimple/lan31/VM-14:1,VM-15:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan32/VM-15:1,VM-16:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan4/VM-3:1,VM-4:0 intraswitch link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null)) link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null))
linksimple/lan5/VM-4:1,VM-5:0 intraswitch link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null)) link-pc3:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc3/eth2,(null))
linksimple/lan54/VM-16:1,VM-26:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan55/VM-27:1,VM-26:1 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan58/VM-24:0,VM-27:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan59/VM-23:0,VM-24:1 intraswitch link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null)) link-pc3:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc3/eth2,(null))
linksimple/lan6/VM-5:1,VM-6:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan65/VM-20:1,VM-21:0 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan66/VM-21:1,VM-19:0 intraswitch link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null)) link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan67/VM-19:1,VM-22:0 intraswitch link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null)) link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan68/VM-22:1,VM-23:1 intraswitch link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null)) link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth1,(null))
linksimple/lan7/VM-6:1,VM-7:0 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan72/VM-6:2,VM-16:2 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan73/VM-5:2,VM-15:2 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan74/VM-4:2,VM-14:2 intraswitch link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc5/eth2,(null)) link-pc3:eth2-procurve2:(null) (pc3/eth2,(null))
linksimple/lan75/VM-3:2,VM-13:2 trivial pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan76/VM-2:2,VM-12:2 trivial pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan77/VM-1:2,VM-11:2 intraswitch link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null) (pc1/eth1,(null)) link-pc2:eth3-procurve2:(null) (pc2/eth3,(null))
linksimple/lan78/VM-0:2,VM-10:2 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan79/VM-10:3,VM-21:2 trivial pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) pc5:loopback (pc5/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan80/VM-11:3,VM-19:2 trivial pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan81/VM-12:3,VM-22:2 trivial pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) pc1:loopback (pc1/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan82/VM-13:3,VM-23:2 trivial pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) pc2:loopback (pc2/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan83/VM-14:3,VM-24:2 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
linksimple/lan84/VM-15:3,VM-27:2 trivial pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) pc3:loopback (pc3/null,(null)) 
End Edges
End solution
Summary:
procurve2 0 vnodes, 2800000 nontrivial BW, 0 trivial BW, type=(null)
pc3 9 vnodes, 400000 nontrivial BW, 1100000 trivial BW, type=pcvm
    400000 link-pc3:eth2-procurve2:(null)
pc5 7 vnodes, 600000 nontrivial BW, 700000 trivial BW, type=pcvm
    600000 link-pc5:eth2-procurve2:(null)
pc1 4 vnodes, 700000 nontrivial BW, 300000 trivial BW, type=pcvm
    700000 link-pc1:eth1-procurve2:(null)
    ?+virtpercent: used=0 total=100
    ?+cpu: used=0 total=2666
    ?+ram: used=0 total=3574
    ?+cpupercent: used=0 total=92
    ?+rampercent: used=0 total=80
pc2 5 vnodes, 1100000 nontrivial BW, 300000 trivial BW, type=pcvm
    1000000 link-pc2:eth1-procurve2:(null)
    100000 link-pc2:eth3-procurve2:(null)
    ?+virtpercent: used=0 total=100
    ?+cpu: used=0 total=2666
    ?+ram: used=0 total=3574
    ?+cpupercent: used=0 total=92
    ?+rampercent: used=0 total=80
Total physical nodes used: 4
End summary
ASSIGN FAILED:
Type precheck passed.
Node mapping precheck succeeded
Policy precheck succeeded
Annealing.
Doing melting run
Reverting: forced
Reverting to best solution
Done
   BEST SCORE:  18.71 in 49000 iters and 0.307011 seconds
  unassigned:  0
  pnode_load:  0
  no_connect:  0
  link_users:  0
  bandwidth:   1
  desires:     0
  vclass:      0
  delay:       0
  trivial mix: 0
  subnodes:    0
  max_types:   0
  endpoints:   0