Changes between Version 27 and Version 28 of OpenFlow/FOAM/Testing


Ignore:
Timestamp:
06/25/12 10:56:09 (12 years ago)
Author:
Josh Smift
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • OpenFlow/FOAM/Testing

    v27 v28  
    531531 * Four that specify ethertypes: The first two don't overlap, the third overlaps with one of the first two, the fourth overlaps with all of the first three.
    532532 * One that specifies a subnet, a MAC address, and an ethertype, each of which overlaps with one of the rspecs in the corresponding one of the three groups above.
    533  * One that includes a more complex flowspace: A subnet that doesn't overlap with anything else, but also an entire VLAN (which should not be auto-approved).
    534  * One that includes two ports that are in a you-can-only-have-one-of-these port group. (FIXME: What does FOAM actually call this? And for that matter, how do you set it?)
     533 * One that includes a subnet that doesn't overlap with anything else, but also an entire VLAN (which should not be auto-approved).
     534 * Five that test various combinations of port groups.
    535535
    536536{{{
     
    935935This subsection tests the behavior of FOAM when new slivers are created and geni.approval.approve-on-creation is set to 1 (always). The expected behavior is that all slivers will automatically be approved after they're created.
    936936
     937Note that we don't test port groups in mode 1, assuming that if an admin is going to always auto-approve everything, they wouldn't even create port groups in the first place.
     938
    937939Double-check the FOAM server's current configuration:
    938940
     
    10611063
    10621064This subsection tests the behavior of FOAM when new slivers are created and geni.approval.approve-on-creation is set to 0 (never). The expected behavior is that all slivers will automatically be pending after they're created.
     1065
     1066Note that we don't test port groups in mode 0, assuming that if an admin is going to never auto-approve anything, they wouldn't even create port groups in the first place.
    10631067
    10641068Double-check the FOAM server's current configuration: