Changes between Version 51 and Version 52 of Gec7InstMeasWGAgenda


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/25/10 15:25:31 (10 years ago)
Author:
hmussman@bbn.com
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Gec7InstMeasWGAgenda

    v51 v52  
    4434435:10pm  Bruce Maggs (Duke University) [[BR]]
    444444
    445 I&M WG process:
    446 +  It was agreed that there should be more I&M WG engineering meetings, where members meet, present proposed solutions, and then review them.
    447 +  How the WG actually reaches a consensus is still TBD,
    448 
    449 Topics discussed were:
    450 +  MD schema
    451 +  I&M services
    452 +  I&M use cases
    453 
    454 Topics not discussed were:
    455 +  Measurement plane definition
    456 
    457 MD schema:
    458 +  First, we need to get it down.
    459 +  Then, expect it to need to be wrong, and thus needs to be modified or additions.
    460 +  Note:  Not always IP-based netwwokr data
    461 +  Those who agreed to work on this topic: 
    462 -  OMF/OML, Max Ott;  in favor of almost null schema
    463 -  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
    464 -  DatCat, Brad Huffaker
    465 -  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
    466 -  CNRI, Larry Lannom
    467 -  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks
    468 
    469 I&M services:
    470 +  Propose set (MP, MC, MAP, MDA and MO) may be a sufficiently good set.
    471 +  How to come to a consensus?
    472 +  Those who agreed to work on this topic: 
    473 -  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen
    474 -  OMF/OML, Max Ott
    475 -  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
    476 -  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
    477 -  OnTime MEasure, Ohio Supercomputing Center
    478 -  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks
     445I&M WG process:[[BR]]
     446+  It was agreed that there should be more I&M WG engineering meetings, where members meet, present proposed solutions, and then review them.[[BR]]
     447+  How the WG actually reaches a consensus is still TBD.  [[BR]]
     448
     449Topics discussed among WG were:[[BR]]
     450+  MD schema[[BR]]
     451+  I&M services[[BR]]
     452+  I&M use cases[[BR]]
     453
     454Topics not discussed among WG were:[[BR]]
     455+  Measurement plane definition[[BR]]
     456
     457MD schema: [[BR]]
     458+  First, we need to get it down. [[BR]]
     459+  Then, expect it to need to be wrong, and thus needs to be modified or additions. [[BR]]
     460+  Note:  Not always IP-based network data [[BR]]
     461+  Those who agreed to work on this topic:   [[BR]]
     462-  OMF/OML, NICTA, Max Ott;  in favor of an almost null schema [[BR]]
     463-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware, (Martin Swany), Guilherme Fernandes, Ezra Kissel [[BR]]
     464-  DatCat, Brad Huffaker [[BR]]
     465-  S3, Purdue, (Sonia Fahmy), Sriharsha Gangam, and HP Labs, Puneet Sharma [[BR]]
     466-  CNRI, Larry Lannom, (Giridhar Manepalli) [[BR]]
     467-  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks [[BR]]
     468-  others? [[BR]]
     469
     470I&M services: [[BR]]
     471+  Propose set (MP, MC, MAP, MDA and MO) may be a sufficiently good set. [[BR]]
     472+  How to come to a consensus? [[BR]]
     473+  Those who agreed to work on this topic:  [[BR]]
     474-  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen, Hussamuddin Nasir [[BR]]
     475-  OMF/OML, NICTA, Max Ott [[BR]]
     476-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware, (Martin Swany), Guilherme Fernandes, Ezra Kissel [[BR]]
     477-  S3, Purdue, (Sonia Fahmy), Sriharsha Gangam, and HP Labs, Puneet Sharma [[BR]]
     478-  OnTime Measure, Ohio Supercomputing Center, Prasad Calyam, Weiphing Mandawa [[BR]]
     479-  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks  [[BR]]
     480-  others? [[BR]]
    479481
    480482I&M Use Cases:
    481 FAgreed that we need this soon!
    482 +  SHould check 2009 workshop attendees.
    483 +  Those who agreed to work on this topic: 
    484 -  CNRI, Larry Lannom
    485 +  Those who are requested to work on this topic:
    486 -  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen
    487 -  OMF/OML, Max Ott
    488 -  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
    489 -  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
    490 -  others?
     483We agreed that we need this soon! [[BR]]
     484+  SHould check 2009 workshop attendees. [[BR]]
     485+  Those who agreed to work on this topic:   [[BR]]
     486-  CNRI, Larry Lannom, (Giridhar Manepalli) [[BR]]
     487+  Those who are requested to work on this topic: [[BR]]
     488-  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen, Hussamuddin Nasir [[BR]]
     489-  OMF/OML, NICTA, Max Ott [[BR]]
     490-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware, (Martin Swany), Guilherme Fernandes, Ezra Kissel [[BR]]
     491-  S3, Purdue, (Sonia Fahmy), Sriharsha Gangam, and HP Labs, Puneet Sharma [[BR]]
     492-  others? [[BR]]
    491493
    492494