Changes between Version 50 and Version 51 of Gec7InstMeasWGAgenda

Timestamp:

03/25/10 12:20:45 (14 years ago)

Author:

hmussman@bbn.com

Comment:

--

Gec7InstMeasWGAgenda

@@ -443 +443 @@
 5:10pm  Bruce Maggs (Duke University) [[BR]]
 
-
-== Wrap-up, review of action items and issues for planary ==
+I&M WG process:
++  It was agreed that there should be more I&M WG engineering meetings, where members meet, present proposed solutions, and then review them.
++  How the WG actually reaches a consensus is still TBD,
+
+Topics discussed were:
++  MD schema
++  I&M services
++  I&M use cases
+
+Topics not discussed were:
++  Measurement plane definition
+
+MD schema:
++  First, we need to get it down.
++  Then, expect it to need to be wrong, and thus needs to be modified or additions.
++  Note:  Not always IP-based netwwokr data
++  Those who agreed to work on this topic:  
+-  OMF/OML, Max Ott;  in favor of almost null schema
+-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
+-  DatCat, Brad Huffaker
+-  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
+-  CNRI, Larry Lannom
+-  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks
+
+I&M services:
++  Propose set (MP, MC, MAP, MDA and MO) may be a sufficiently good set.
++  How to come to a consensus?
++  Those who agreed to work on this topic:  
+-  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen
+-  OMF/OML, Max Ott
+-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
+-  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
+-  OnTime MEasure, Ohio Supercomputing Center
+-  Brian Hay, Univ Alaska/Fairbanks 
+
+I&M Use Cases:
++  FAgreed that we need this soon!
++  SHould check 2009 workshop attendees.
++  Those who agreed to work on this topic:  
+-  CNRI, Larry Lannom
++  Those who are requested to work on this topic:
+-  INSTOOLS, Univ Kentucky, Jim Griffioen
+-  OMF/OML, Max Ott
+-  LAMP/perf SONAR, Univ Delaware
+-  S3, Purdue and HP Labs
+-  others?
+
+
+== Review for Planary ==
 5:25pm  Harry Mussman  (GPO) [[BR]]
 [http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/Gec7InstMeasWGAgenda/031710%20WGInstAndMeas_Report.ppt  slides] [[BR]]