Changes between Version 45 and Version 46 of GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/25/12 16:53:34 (12 years ago)
Author:
lnevers@bbn.com
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey

    v45 v46  
    1313== AM API Acceptance Tests ==
    1414
    15 Using the RSpec from the previous survey was not able to run the test with the same options as on 04/25/2012.  The AM API acceptance test defaults to RSpec V3 while the RSpec are V2, this was not reported as a problem last time, but now seems to cause all 13 tests to fail. If interested in this mismatched scenario, see the [http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey/failed-v3-support.txt command output] and the [http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey/exogeni-log-20120425.txt log] for details.
     15Using the RSpec from the previous survey was not able to run the test with the same options as on 04/25/2012.  The AM API acceptance test defaults to RSpec V3 while the RSpec I had been using were V2. This mismatch was not reported as a problem last time, but now seems to cause all 13 tests to fail. If interested in this mismatched RSpec versions scenario, see the [http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey/failed-v3-support.txt command output] and the [http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/GENIRacksHome/ExogeniRacks/AggregateSurvey/exogeni-log-20120425.txt log] for details.
    1616
    1717Re-run acceptance test with the new argument "--ProtoGENIv2" for the V2 RSpecs:
     
    9494== Experiments with Omni Commands ==
    9595
    96 Ran several experiments using various combinations of aggregates and hosts, only one very minor issue was found relating to requesting resources at the wrong component manager, see ticket [http://groups.geni.net/exogeni/ticket/2 ticket 2] for details.  Following are the Experiements that were tested:
     96Ran several experiments using various combinations of aggregates and hosts, only one very minor issue was found relating to requesting resources at the wrong component manager, see ticket [http://groups.geni.net/exogeni/ticket/2 ticket 2] for details.  Following are the Experiments that were tested:
    9797
    98981. Set up a 2 nodes (1@BBN, 1@RENCI) experiment using the ExoSM (!https://geni.renci.org:11443/orca/xmlrpc) only. Same RSpec as previous survey (04/11/2012).  This experiment worked as expected. Two nodes were allocated and the requested addresses were configured on the hosts with the requested link.  Verified connectivity between the two hosts by running ping concurrently on each host in each direction for 10 minutes.
     
    1061065. Created a 2 node (2@RENCI) experiment using RENCI SM (!https://bbn-hn.exogeni.gpolab.bbn.com:11443/orca/xmlrpc). See RSpec [here].  This experiment worked as expected. Two nodes were allocated and the requested addresses were configured on the hosts with the requested link. Verified connectivity.
    107107
    108 
    109 
     108=== List Resources ===
     109Ran list resources at each of the 3 aggregates:
     110{{{
     111 $ ./src/omni.py -a https://bbn-hn.exogeni.net:11443/orca/xmlrpc listresources -o   # BBN rack SM
     112 $ ./src/omni.py -a https://rci-hn.exogeni.net:11443/orca/xmlrpc listresources -o  # RENCI rack SM
     113 $ ./src/omni.py -a  https://geni.renci.org:11443/orca/xmlrpc listresources -o     # ExoGENI SM
     114}}}
     115List resources output file attached as [ rspec-bbn-hn-exogeni-net-11443-orca.xml], rspec-rci-hn-exogeni-net-11443-orca.xml and  [rspec-geni-renci-org-11443-orca.xml
    110116
    111117= Status 04/11/2012 =