Changes between Version 30 and Version 31 of GEC11InstMeasWorkingSession


Ignore:
Timestamp:
07/28/11 10:20:26 (11 years ago)
Author:
hmussman@bbn.com
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GEC11InstMeasWorkingSession

    v30 v31  
    135135==== 2.5  Next Steps ====
    136136   First review of data model and schema  (completed)  [[BR]]
     137
    137138   For each tool:  map key elements into current data model;  review expected use cases  who?  when?  [[BR]]
    138139   Review suggested approach to recording provenance   who?  when?  [[BR]]
     
    220221
    221222==== 4.1) Measurement Data Object Descriptors (MDODs)  (“metadata”) ====
    222    Complete defining common data model by ?  who?[[BR]]
    223    Complete formal schema by?   who?[[BR]]
    224    First prototype software to create MDOD by ?   who?[[BR]]
    225    Understand relationship to rspec?  [[BR]]
    226 
    227 ==== 4.2) Deployment Plan for Tools and Services  ====
    228 
    229 
    230 
    231 ==== 4.3)  Prototype Operational Services ====
    232    Measurement Data Archive (MDA) service, including User Workspace (UW) service and Digital Object Archive (DOA) service [[BR]]
    233    INSTOOLS portal?[[BR]]
    234    perfSONAR/LAMP lookup (measurement information) service?[[BR]]
    235    Centralized OML server?  [[BR]]
    236    others?[[BR]]
     223   First review of data model and schema  (completed)  [[BR]]
     224
     225   For each tool:  map key elements into current data model;  review expected use cases  who?  when?  [[BR]]
     226   Review suggested approach to recording provenance   who?  when?  [[BR]]
     227   Review choice for primary and secondary identifiers  who?  when?  [[BR]]
     228   Review formats for slice_id, etc.  who?  when?  [[BR]]
     229
     230   Understand relationship to rspec?  who?  when? [[BR]]
     231
     232   Complete third pass at data model and schema     who?  when?[[BR]]
     233 
     234   Complete first prototype software to create MDOD  who?  when?[[BR]]
     235
     236
     237==== 4.3)  Deploy Prototype Operational Services ====
     238   Measurement Data Archive (MDA) service, including User Workspace (UW) service and Digital Object Archive (DOA) service   (ongoing)  [[BR]]
     239   INSTOOLS portal?   who?  when? [[BR]]
     240   INSTOOLS archive service?  who?  when?  [[BR]]
     241   perfSONAR/LAMP lookup (Measurement Information) service?  who?  when?[[BR]]
     242   other MI service?   who?  when? [[BR]]
     243   Centralized OML server? (useful for monitoring WiMAX sites)  who?  when? [[BR]]
     244   others?  [[BR]]
    237245
    238246
    239247==== 4.4) Integrate I&M services for Experimenters ====
     248   INSTOOLS tools with MDA service (ongoing) [[BR]]
     249   OnTimeMeas tools, with MDA service   (ongoing) [[BR]]
    240250
    241251
    242252==== 4.5) Integrate I&M services for Operators monitoring infrastructure ====
     253   LAMP for OpenFlow slice monitoring  (Ali Sydney) [[BR]]
    243254
    244255
    245256==== 4.6) Use DOA for Sharing Data with Others ====
     257   Who?  when? [[BR]]
    246258
    247259
    248260==== 4.7) Authorization Mechanisms ====
    249 
    250 
    251   Note from Jim on 7/6:  As for other topics you may want to discuss, one of the things that continues to be a big headache for us is limiting access to measurement data.  Currently we have to deal with several different users accounts, authentication schemes, object granularity, etc.   BTW, we have integrated INSTOOLS with the CNRI workspace model, but again, they have yet another set of user accounts and passwords to deal with. If we could start moving toward some standards in this area, that would be very helpful.  [[BR]]
     261   Define situation  who?  when? [[BR]]
     262   Note from Jim on 7/6:  As for other topics you may want to discuss, one of the things that continues to be a big headache for us is limiting access to measurement data.  Currently we have to deal with several different users accounts, authentication schemes, object granularity, etc.   BTW, we have integrated INSTOOLS with the CNRI workspace model, but again, they have yet another set of user accounts and passwords to deal with. If we could start moving toward some standards in this area, that would be very helpful.  [[BR]]
     263
     264   Suggest approaches  who?  when? [[BR]]
    252265
    253266==== 4.8) Extensions ====
    254267   Use MDA as a full Experiment Repository to archive all experiment objects, including:  meas data;  software;  topology/rspec?  [[BR]]
    255268   Use various versions of MDOD to negotiate transfer of data object, e.g., like GENI resource assignment;  use versions of MDOD to like rspec advertisement, request, amnifest.  [[BR]]
    256   Use MDOD with descriptor and holder/transaction records for "object assignment record";  use similar structure in GENI resource assignment to give "resource usage record"
     269  Use MDOD with descriptor and holder/transaction records for "object assignment record";  use similar structure in GENI resource assignment to give "resource usage record"   [[BR]]
    257270   
    258271