| 1 | This directory contains the request RSpecs used for the |
|---|
| 2 | three experiments described in EG-EXP-6. |
|---|
| 3 | |
|---|
| 4 | Experiment1/User lnevers: (EG-EXP-6-exp1-*) |
|---|
| 5 | |
|---|
| 6 | - 1 VM w/shared VLAN at BBN |
|---|
| 7 | - 1 VM w/shared VLAN at RENCI |
|---|
| 8 | - SubNet used 10.42.19.0 |
|---|
| 9 | - OpenFlow Controller on port 33017 |
|---|
| 10 | |
|---|
| 11 | Experiment2/User lnevers1: (EG-EXP-6-exp2-*) |
|---|
| 12 | |
|---|
| 13 | - 2 VM w/shared VLAN at BBN (See note 1) |
|---|
| 14 | - 2 VM w/shared VLAN at RENCI |
|---|
| 15 | - SubNet used 10.42.18.0 |
|---|
| 16 | - OpenFlow Controller on port 33018 |
|---|
| 17 | |
|---|
| 18 | Experiment3/User lnevers2: (EG-EXP-6-exp3-*) |
|---|
| 19 | - 1 PG GPO MESO |
|---|
| 20 | - 1 WAPG |
|---|
| 21 | - 1 VM w/shared VLAN at BBN |
|---|
| 22 | - SubNet used 10.42.11.0 |
|---|
| 23 | - OpenFlow Controller is on port 33020 |
|---|
| 24 | |
|---|
| 25 | Note 1: Test case was originally written to include one bare metal node. |
|---|
| 26 | The bare metal nodes are only available via ExoSM, which brings up the |
|---|
| 27 | following options: |
|---|
| 28 | |
|---|
| 29 | a. Replace the BBN SM reservation with a reservation via the ExoSM, |
|---|
| 30 | but this will cause the next step to fail. The RENCI SM reservation |
|---|
| 31 | will report that a sliver by that name already exists, due to the |
|---|
| 32 | ExoSM request. To get around this problem, one option is to replace |
|---|
| 33 | the bare metal node with a VM, so that the requests could be submitted |
|---|
| 34 | as expected to each of the local SMs. |
|---|
| 35 | |
|---|
| 36 | b. Replace the BBN SM reservation with a reservation via the ExoSM, but |
|---|
| 37 | create a new slice and sliver name for the RCI portion. So the BBN |
|---|
| 38 | resources are reserved via the ExoSM, and the RENCI resources are |
|---|
| 39 | reserved via the local RENCI SM. |
|---|
| 40 | |
|---|
| 41 | Option a was chosen for this test. |
|---|
| 42 | |
|---|
