| 78 | | 15min [[BR]] |
| 79 | | |
| 80 | | How do we move towards common graphical resource assignment tool(s) for both ExoGENI and InstaGENI racks? [[BR]] |
| 81 | | |
| 82 | | What can we learn from current tools? [[BR]] |
| 83 | | |
| 84 | | What capabilities are required? desirable? [[BR]] |
| 85 | | |
| 86 | | Can we adapt a current tool? or do we need a new tool? or multiple new tools? [[BR]] |
| 87 | | |
| 88 | | Is there new technology that should be used? [[BR]] |
| 89 | | |
| 90 | | |
| 91 | | [Any additional topics, suggestions and issues suggested by members of roundtable?] [[BR]] |
| 92 | | |
| 93 | | At the end: |
| 94 | | * List of conclusions |
| 95 | | * List of issues |
| 96 | | * Team to continue discussion |
| | 78 | 15min [[BR]] |
| | 79 | |
| | 80 | |
| | 81 | Conclusions on how do we move towards common graphical resource assignment tool(s) for both ExoGENI and InstaGENI racks? [[BR]] |
| | 82 | |
| | 83 | 1) FLACK works with InstaGENI, now using AM API |
| | 84 | |
| | 85 | 2) Need to test FLACK with ExoGENI using AM API; may have issue with accepting certificate |
| | 86 | |
| | 87 | 3) FLUKES has been designed for ORCA API, and would be difficult to adapt to AM API (for use with InstaGENI) |
| | 88 | |
| | 89 | 4) However, could use FLUKES to setup slice in ExoGENI rack using ORCA API, and then retrieve manifest rspec following AM API |
| | 90 | |
| | 91 | Issues: [[BR]] |
| | 92 | |
| | 93 | 5) Can draw a bigger topology than can be realized; not sure this can be fixed at drawing time, only after first submission of request; however, could consider "beginner's mode", which would limit drawing topology |
| | 94 | |
| | 95 | Team to continue discussion: |
| | 96 | |
| | 97 | Tom Mitchell (GPO); Victor Orlikowski (Duke); Ilia Baldine (RENCI); Rob Ricci and Matt Strum (Univ Utah); Niky Riga (GPO) |
| | 98 | |
